Change models of the Clone Reinforcement jobs

[chi.dev]

Your In-Game Name: ABG Chi
Suggestion: Change the models of the Clone Reinforcement jobs to use the AussiWozzi models we already have on the server
Addons Needed (workshop link): None
Reason:
The Herm models we have are basically pointless as we already have a bunch of models for the Clone Reinforcement jobs (which imo look a LOT better), so we should save on content size by using what we already have on the server.

All models are listed left-to-right in the screenshots.
442nd:
- models/aussiwozzi/cgi/base/442nd_odin.mdl
- models/aussiwozzi/cgi/base/442nd_raffle.mdl
91st:
- models/aussiwozzi/cgi/base/91st_razor.mdl
- models/aussiwozzi/cgi/base/91st_strac.mdl
- models/aussiwozzi/cgi/base/91st_strike.mdl


Jaguar Hunters:
- models/aussiwozzi/cgi/base/jaguar_arf.mdl
- models/aussiwozzi/cgi/base/jaguar_trooper.mdl
Doom's Unit:
- models/aussiwozzi/cgi/base/doom_jet.mdl
- models/aussiwozzi/cgi/base/doom_hrs.mdl
- models/aussiwozzi/cgi/base/doom_sydney.mdl

 

[Chaos]

+1 I support the removal of Herm models and these just look much better anyways

 

[SynergyJohn]

+1, switching back to models that have no issues and don't risk anything, they look extremely nice as well for the ones that we have.

 

[ShadowRyser]

Always thought these ones looked nicer, alot cleaner too, I have a PAC for every reinforcement

 

[FatmanBeans]

more detail on these tan any other model that was used for the previous parts

 

[Dandy]

Don't you dare get rid of my DU model.

On a more serious note, would it not be better to just add these models as additional models, instead of removing the models already there. Meaning the people playing the jobs can choose what model to use, as I know personally I much prefer the Dirty DU model over the clean ones (the other ones I care less about).

don't risk anything

Would like to add, all of Herms MVG models are in an MVG Pack under our Control. So there is no risk to continue using them

 

[SynergyJohn]

So there is no risk to continue using them

That persuades me, I would be all for adding them then but there is a lot more that look quite... bad for regiments, so I might make a separate suggestion for them (at least for my own regiment)

 

[Tom]

Only issue with these models atm is that they are lacking textures. Even if we get them to exist without the missing textures they could be further used in events and yeah just be an addition to an already existing job.

 

[SynergyJohn]

they are lacking textures

Unsure how much work it would take since the textures are in the packs but evidently not on the server, it might just be adjusting the current server content to just have the textures but /shrug

 

[Smooley]

I like the idea of having a bit more of a selection, would like to just see more jobs in that pack if possible?

 

[SynergyJohn]

I like the idea of having a bit more of a selection, would like to just see more jobs in that pack if possible?

Sure, here's the details of the ones left out of there.



While Odin and Raffle (2 last) are included in the above, the others are medics or officers and were excluded.



Here are the models for 91st. most were excluded once again due to being medics or ARC in this case.



Here is DU, only ones that were put above were the ones not explicitly listed as officers, and ARC was also excluded.

As for Jaguar, practically every model is up above, the only one that is excluded is a single Officer model.

 

[Lucielxf]

If the suggest model have higher quality and the current one is not creating problem. Depending on the file size, I agreed with adding both to the server.

 

[Lexi]

I agreed with adding both to the server.

it's adding nothing. these are already on the server, very good models, and unused. might as well put them to use

 

[Lucielxf]

it's adding nothing. these are already on the server, very good models, and unused. might as well put them to use

Oops, didn't see that part of the suggestion but yeah I agreed

 

[Tom]

I just remembered, GC are using on the the 442nd models, meaning if adding these to 442nd they would need to be removed from the GC jobs. Or have some way around it

 

[ShadowRyser]

Sure, here's the details of the ones left out of there.

View attachment 724

While Odin and Raffle (2 last) are included in the above, the others are medics or officers and were excluded.

View attachment 725

Here are the models for 91st. most were excluded once again due to being medics or ARC in this case.

View attachment 726

Here is DU, only ones that were put above were the ones not explicitly listed as officers, and ARC was also excluded.

As for Jaguar, practically every model is up above, the only one that is excluded is a single Officer model.

Why would we exclude the officer models when the body group rules don't apply to clone reinforcements?

 

[Tom]

Why would we exclude the officer models when the body group rules don't apply to clone reinforcements?

Yeah only real exceptions should be Medical and ARC models but didn't even know it didn't apply to clone reinforcements

 

[SynergyJohn]

Why would we exclude the officer models when the body group rules don't apply to clone reinforcements?

I can edit it to allow the Officer models, was more me just assuming that since they only get SGT that anything explicitly "Officer" should be excluded

 

[ShadowRyser]

I can edit it to allow the Officer models, was more me just assuming that since they only get SGT that anything explicitly "Officer" should be excluded

May as well add them in it doesn't really matter since everyone knows that they only sit at SGT an just adds an extra skin that would otherwise be unused still

 

[SynergyJohn]

Alright I didn't realise, it's only one Officer that I excluded, the rest are medics or ARC, the only officer is 91st_strike_officer.mdl