Give 212th vehicles more spawn points

Status
Not open for further replies.
>Major Wasp<

>Major Wasp<

Member
Sep 9, 2023
18
5
3
Your In-Game Name: 212th XO DSM Waxer | Wasp

Suggestion: Give 212th vehicles more spawn points

Addons Needed (workshop link): N/A

Reason:

With how huge the maps are It saves us time from having to run back to base or wait out half the event for a laat/c to pick up our vehicles when they are destroyed and it also acts as like a checkpoint for when we recapture an outpost during an event.

Below are the spawn locations we'd like to have them in:

Titan rishi:

Whiskey: TX + ATTE (Near the LZ)

============================

Anaxes:

Zeta: TX + ATTE (TX can be in the tank hangers and ATTE can be in the middle facing the gate)
 
  • Like
Reactions: OasisVex
There is a reason for why LAAT/c exists. It should just be used, if it takes too long bring it forward to people in character or something don't try to go around it and try to implement a change OOC to work around the teamwork with 327th. Also it would be kinda strong being able to bring back vehicles so strong back into combat with such ease, the destruction of the vehicle should serve as a punishment and that's why it should remain as it is. One thing you could maybe look into is asking for repair pads at Whiskey or Zeta but thats kinda pushing it as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Random and BappoNoHacko
Tom said:
There is a reason for why LAAT/c exists. It should just be used, if it takes too long bring it forward to people in character or something don't try to go around it and try to implement a change OOC to work around the teamwork with 327th. Also it would be kinda strong being able to bring back vehicles so strong back into combat with such ease, the destruction of the vehicle should serve as a punishment and that's why it should remain as it is. One thing you could maybe look into is asking for repair pads at Whiskey or Zeta but thats kinda pushing it as well.
Click to expand...
I see exactly what you mean by this tom and i'm not saying 327th are useless or anything like that, we'd still love to work with them but there response usually comes in a bit late and by the time a LAAT/c does appear the event is already 3/4 of the way from being finished and there would be no point in using them, our vehicles are here to be a vital key on the frontlines and if it can't be there, is there a point in having vehicles at all?
 
>Major Wasp< said:
I see exactly what you mean by this tom and i'm not saying 327th are useless or anything like that, we'd still love to work with them but there response usually comes in a bit late and by the time a LAAT/c does appear the event is already 3/4 of the way from being finished and there would be no point in using them, our vehicles are here to be a vital key on the frontlines and if it can't be there, is there a point in having vehicles at all?
Click to expand...
You know you can take it up, and talk to them about it outside of the event. Simply talking to Fleet people about prioritising tank transport, or simply giving them a notice like you just deployed a TX and know you might head out so might as well ask 327th to get LAAT/c ready for you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BappoNoHacko and Random
the thing is only sentinels or talon get the LAAT/c too my knowledge, so LT and SGT cant fly it

perhaps that could be suggested
 
Dogo said:
the thing is only sentinels or talon get the LAAT/c too my knowledge, so LT and SGT cant fly it

perhaps that could be suggested
Click to expand...
SGT+ in 327th should have LAAT/c on their jobs bar I think medics and K comp.
 
Shac said:
SGT+ in 327th should have LAAT/c on their jobs bar I think medics and K comp.
Click to expand...
Checked, a lot more jobs are missing LAAT/c even thought its SGT+
The list is: LT's , K-Comp, 327th ARC and 327th Medics (Including Spec leads job as well)
I'm surprised there hasn't been a bug report regarding the LT job at least.
 
I feel like I remember which event this suggestion popped up after, whether or not it was because of that event I don't really know.

I think that maybe Zeta would be cool to have as a secondary spawn point seeing as a LAAT/c on Anaxes is usually really rare, and I've only seen it when it's going to Waterfall Caves, leaving a little travel is okay I feel.

Whiskey seems a bit much seeing as the LAAT/c is very, very, important on Rishi due to the size and having to cross map borders, I feel like letting 327th retain their ability to be required for transport there would be nice.
 
SynergyJohn said:
I feel like I remember which event this suggestion popped up after, whether or not it was because of that event I don't really know.

I think that maybe Zeta would be cool to have as a secondary spawn point seeing as a LAAT/c on Anaxes is usually really rare, and I've only seen it when it's going to Waterfall Caves, leaving a little travel is okay I feel.

Whiskey seems a bit much seeing as the LAAT/c is very, very, important on Rishi due to the size and having to cross map borders, I feel like letting 327th retain their ability to be required for transport there would be nice.
Click to expand...
1. It has nothing to do with said event (And if i'm thinking what your thinking, it's gotta be the one where our tank got destroyed 10 times in a row to a snail tank in MH on anaxes)

2. I'm glad you agree with that point and if this suggestion gets denied i'd hope at least this one will be accepted

3. there's currently a bug on rishi where even if you managed to pick up the TX with a LAAT/c and head to whiskey, the TX just seems to fly away and only the LAAT/c enters whiskey, so the only way to enter whiskey with a TX would be via the caves
 
As said before you don't see the LAAT/c very often due to not many 327th having access to it, another reason is because getting a LAAT/c granted depending on the OD/staff member doing the event is like pulling a tooth from a 6 year old.
 
When it comes specifically to Rishi, this right here is the reason we dont use the LAAT/c
 
85bf85f.png

The following Suggestion has been Denied

The Staff team has agreed to deny this suggestion. The reason for this is that we think this would make the LAAT-C a lot less used, and because we see no reason for this when the LAAT-C exists for this exact reason, to transport vehicles to where the battlefield is.

// Locked and moved to Denied.​
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back